MAKES

Toyota

Toyota > Tundra II Regular Cab Long Bed 4.0 V6 24V (236 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009
  • Engine Engine 3956 cm3
  • Power Power 236 hp
  • Torque Torque 361 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 100 Liter (26 gal)
Year
Toyota Tundra II Regular Cab Long Bed 4.0 V6 24V (236 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 6
  • Number of valves 4x6
  • Power 236 hp
  • Max output (P) 5200 rpm
  • Torque 361 Nm
  • Max output (T) 4000
  • Wheel drive All wheel drive (4x4)
  • Number of doors 2
  • Number of seats 3
  • Tire size front 255/70 R18; 275/65 R18; 275/55 R20
  • Tire size rear 255/70 R18; 275/65 R18; 275/55 R20
Year
Toyota Tundra II Regular Cab Long Bed 4.0 V6 24V (236 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Pick-up
  • Length 5810 mm
  • Width 2030 mm
  • Height 1925 mm
  • Wheelbase 3700 mm
  • Turning Circle 13.6 m
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) 2139 kg
  • Total load weight 2903 kg
  • Loading capacity 764 kg
  • Roof load -

Toyota Tundra II Regular Cab Long Bed 4.0 V6 24V Review

2009 Toyota Tundra II Regular Cab Long Bed 4.0’s production started in 2006 and continued in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Tundra 4.0 V6 24V is a 2 doors Pick-up in Rear wheel drive. Automobile weight is 2139 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. Tundra II Regular Cab Long Bed 4.0 V6 24V has a 4.0 l engine. With 3956 cc engine size it produces 236 Hp horsepower and 361 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with All wheel drive (4x4) wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in seconds. Top speed is limited by km/h (0 mph). The engine has a standard. Fuel tank capacity is 100 liters. Consumption in city is N/A lt/100km, consumption in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is N/A lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated Tundra II Regular Cab Long Bed 4.0 V6 24V real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«