MAKES

Volkswagen

Volkswagen > Golf IV 3.2 i VR6 24V RSI (240 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2002- 2003
  • Engine Engine 3189 cm3
  • Power Power 240 hp
  • Torque Torque 310 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 62 Liter (16 gal)
Year Real MPG & Fuel Consumption
Average Fuel Consumption Cruise Average Speed Submiter
17.0 lt/100km High Way Medium (40 - 80 km/s) Guest
03.12.2020
Year
Volkswagen Golf IV 3.2 i VR6 24V RSI (240 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 6
  • Number of valves 4x6
  • Power 240 hp
  • Max output (P) 6200 rpm
  • Torque 310 Nm
  • Max output (T) 3000
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 3
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 225/40 R18
  • Tire size rear 225/40 R18
Year
Volkswagen Golf IV 3.2 i VR6 24V RSI (240 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Hatchback
  • Length 4150 mm
  • Width 1735 mm
  • Height 1414 mm
  • Wheelbase 2518 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume 330 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 1475 kg
  • Total load weight 2000 kg
  • Loading capacity 525 kg
  • Roof load -

Volkswagen Golf IV 3.2 i VR6 24V RSI Review

2003 Volkswagen Golf IV 3.2 is first presented in 2002 and proceeded in 2002 and 2003. Golf 3.2 i VR6 24V RSI is a 3 doors Hatchback in All wheel drive (4x4). Weight of the vehicle is 1475 kg with 330 liters trunk loading capacity. Golf IV 3.2 i VR6 24V RSI is powered by a 3.2 l engine. This 3189 cc engine size produces 240 Hp horsepower with 310 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 6.6 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 247 km/h (153 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 62 liters. Fuel economy in city is N/A lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel economy is N/A lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Golf IV 3.2 i VR6 24V RSI real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«