MAKES

Nissan

Nissan > Prairie 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2002- 2003- 2004
  • Engine Engine 1998 cm3
  • Power Power 147 hp
  • Torque Torque 198 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 60 Liter (16 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

7,7 lt/100km

37 MPG (UK) - 31 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

12 lt/100km

24 MPG (UK) - 20 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

88,68 £

103,26 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Nissan Prairie 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 4x4
  • Power 147 hp
  • Max output (P) 6000 rpm
  • Torque 198 Nm
  • Max output (T) 4000
  • Wheel drive Rear wheel drive
  • Number of doors 4
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 195/65 R15
  • Tire size rear 195/65 R15
Year
Nissan Prairie 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Minivan
  • Length 4575 mm
  • Width 1695 mm
  • Height 1630 mm
  • Wheelbase 2690 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) 1490 kg
  • Total load weight -
  • Loading capacity -
  • Roof load -

Nissan Prairie 2.0 i 16V Review

2004 Nissan Prairie 2.0’s production started in 2002 and continued in 2002, 2003 and 2004. Prairie 2.0 i 16V is a 4 doors Minivan in Front wheel drive. Automobile weight is 1490 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. Prairie 2.0 i 16V has a 2.0 l engine. With 1998 cc engine size it produces 147 Hp horsepower and 198 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with Rear wheel drive wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in seconds. Top speed is limited by km/h (0 mph). The engine has a standard. Fuel tank capacity is 60 liters. Consumption in city is 0,0 lt/100km, consumption in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is 7,7 lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated Prairie 2.0 i 16V real World MPG/consumption is 11,7 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 52 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«