MAKES

Nissan

Nissan > Micra 1.2 i 16V (65 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010
  • Engine Engine 1240 cm3
  • Power Power 65 hp
  • Torque Torque 110 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 46 Liter (12 gal)
Year Real MPG & Fuel Consumption
Average Fuel Consumption Cruise Average Speed Submiter
7.0 lt/100km Urban Medium (40 - 80 km/s) Guest
24.04.2025
8.0 lt/100km Combined Fast (80 - 120 km/s) Guest
08.07.2025
Year
Nissan Micra 1.2 i 16V (65 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 4x4
  • Power 65 hp
  • Max output (P) 5200 rpm
  • Torque 110 Nm
  • Max output (T) 3600
  • Wheel drive Rear wheel drive
  • Number of doors 3/5
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 165/70 R14
  • Tire size rear 165/70 R14
Year
Nissan Micra 1.2 i 16V (65 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Hatchback
  • Length 3715 mm
  • Width 1660 mm
  • Height 1525 mm
  • Wheelbase 2430 mm
  • Turning Circle 9.8 m
  • Trunk Volume 371 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 980 kg
  • Total load weight 1475 kg
  • Loading capacity 495 kg
  • Roof load -

Nissan Micra 1.2 i 16V Review

2010 Nissan Micra 1.2 is first presented in 2005 and proceeded in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010. Micra 1.2 i 16V is a 3/5 doors Hatchback in Front wheel drive. Weight of the vehicle is 980 kg with 371 liters trunk loading capacity. Micra 1.2 i 16V is powered by a 1.2 l engine. This 1240 cc engine size produces 65 Hp horsepower with 110 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Rear wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 16.3 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 154 km/h (96 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 46 liters. Fuel economy in city is N/A lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel economy is N/A lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Micra 1.2 i 16V real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«