MAKES

Nissan

Nissan > Cedric 2.5T (260 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004
  • Engine Engine 2498 cm3
  • Power Power 260 hp
  • Torque Torque 324 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 80 Liter (21 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

12,5 lt/100km

23 MPG (UK) - 19 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

21 lt/100km

13 MPG (UK) - 11 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

118,24 £

137,68 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Nissan Cedric 2.5T (260 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 6
  • Number of valves 4x6
  • Power 260 hp
  • Max output (P) 6400 rpm
  • Torque 324 Nm
  • Max output (T) 2800
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 4
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 205/60 R16
  • Tire size rear 205/60 R16
Year
Nissan Cedric 2.5T (260 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Sedan
  • Length 4860 mm
  • Width 1770 mm
  • Height 1465 mm
  • Wheelbase 2800 mm
  • Turning Circle 11.6 m
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) 1710 kg
  • Total load weight 1985 kg
  • Loading capacity 275 kg
  • Roof load -

Nissan Cedric 2.5T Review

2004 Nissan Cedric 2.5’s production started in 1999 and continued in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004. Cedric 2.5T is a 4 doors Sedan in All wheel drive (4x4). Automobile weight is 1710 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. Cedric 2.5T has a 2.5 l engine. With 2498 cc engine size it produces 260 Hp horsepower and 324 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in 7.8 seconds. Top speed is limited by 235 km/h (146 mph). The engine has a standard. Fuel tank capacity is 80 liters. Consumption in city is 0,0 lt/100km, consumption in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is 12,5 lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated Cedric 2.5T real World MPG/consumption is 21,0 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 68 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«