MAKES

Ford

Ford > Everest II 2.0 (214 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2018- 2019- 2020- 2021- 2022
  • Engine Engine 1996 cm3
  • Power Power 214 hp
  • Torque Torque 500 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Diesel
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 80 Liter (21 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

7,1 lt/100km

40 MPG (UK) - 33 MPG (US)
Year CO2 Emissions 184,0 g/100km
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

11 lt/100km

25 MPG (UK) - 21 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

118,24 £

137,68 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Ford Everest II 2.0 (214 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 4x4
  • Power 214 hp
  • Max output (P) 3750 rpm
  • Torque 500 Nm
  • Max output (T) 1750
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 5-7
  • Tire size front -
  • Tire size rear -
Year
Ford Everest II 2.0 (214 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type SUV
  • Length 4903 mm
  • Width 1869 mm
  • Height 1837 mm
  • Wheelbase 2850 mm
  • Turning Circle 11.7 m
  • Trunk Volume 450 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 2477 kg
  • Total load weight 3100 kg
  • Loading capacity 623 kg
  • Roof load -

Ford Everest II 2.0 Review

2022 Ford Everest II 2.0’s production started in 2018 and continued in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. Everest 2.0 is a 5 doors SUV in All wheel drive (4x4). Automobile weight is 2477 kg with 450 liters trunk loading capacity. Everest II 2.0 has a 2.0 l engine. With 1996 cc engine size it produces 214 Hp horsepower and 500 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in seconds. Top speed is limited by km/h (0 mph). The engine has a standard. Fuel tank capacity is 80 liters. Consumption in city is 0,0 lt/100km, consumption in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is 7,1 lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated Everest II 2.0 real World MPG/consumption is 11,1 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 56 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«