MAKES

Peugeot

Peugeot > 806 2.0 16V (136 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 1998- 1999- 2000
  • Engine Engine 1997 cm3
  • Power Power 136 hp
  • Torque Torque 190 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 80 Liter (21 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

9,2 lt/100km

31 MPG (UK) - 26 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

14 lt/100km

20 MPG (UK) - 17 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

118,24 £

137,68 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Peugeot 806 2.0 16V (136 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 4x4
  • Power 136 hp
  • Max output (P) 6000 rpm
  • Torque 190 Nm
  • Max output (T) 4100
  • Wheel drive Rear wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 205/65 R15
  • Tire size rear 205/65 R15
Year
Peugeot 806 2.0 16V (136 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Minivan
  • Length 4454 mm
  • Width 1834 mm
  • Height 1714 mm
  • Wheelbase 2824 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume 340 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 1600 kg
  • Total load weight 2315 kg
  • Loading capacity 715 kg
  • Roof load -

Peugeot 806 2.0 16V Review

2000 Peugeot 806 2.0 is first presented in 1998 and proceeded in 1998, 1999 and 2000. 806 2.0 16V is a 5 doors Minivan in Front wheel drive. Weight of the vehicle is 1600 kg with 340 liters trunk loading capacity. 806 2.0 16V is powered by a 2.0 l engine. This 1997 cc engine size produces 136 Hp horsepower with 190 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Rear wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 11.9 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 186 km/h (116 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 80 liters. Fuel economy in city is 0,0 lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel economy is 9,2 lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. 806 2.0 16V real World MPG/consumption is 14,2 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 55 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«