Mazda

Mazda > MX-5 III 2.0 (161 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012
  • Engine Engine 1999 cm3
  • Power Power 161 hp
  • Torque Torque 188 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 0 Liter (0 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

8,0 lt/100km

35 MPG (UK) - 29 MPG (US)
Year CO2 Emissions 188,0 g/100km
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

12 lt/100km

23 MPG (UK) - 19 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

0,00 £

0,00 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Mazda MX-5 III 2.0 (161 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves -x4
  • Power 161 hp
  • Max output (P) 7000 rpm
  • Torque 188 Nm
  • Max output (T) 5000
  • Wheel drive All wheel drive (4x4)
  • Number of doors 2
  • Number of seats 2
  • Tire size front 205/45 R17
  • Tire size rear 205/45 R17
Year
Mazda MX-5 III 2.0 (161 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Cabriolet
  • Length 4020 mm
  • Width 1720 mm
  • Height -
  • Wheelbase 2330 mm
  • Turning Circle 10 m
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) 1100 kg
  • Total load weight -
  • Loading capacity -
  • Roof load -

Mazda MX-5 III 2.0 Review

2012 Mazda MX-5 III 2.0’s production started in 2008 and continued in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. MX-5 2.0 is a 2 doors Cabriolet in Rear wheel drive. Automobile weight is 1100 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. MX-5 III 2.0 has a 2.0 l engine. With 1999 cc engine size it produces 161 Hp horsepower and 188 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with All wheel drive (4x4) wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in 8.9 seconds. Top speed is limited by 194 km/h (121 mph). The engine has a Euro 5 standard. Fuel tank capacity is 0 liters. Consumption in city is 0,0 lt/100km, consumption in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is 8,0 lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated MX-5 III 2.0 real World MPG/consumption is 12,5 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 56 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«