MAKES

Mazda

Mazda > MX-5 II 1.8 Turbo (172 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2004- 2005
  • Engine Engine 1839 cm3
  • Power Power 172 hp
  • Torque Torque 209 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 48 Liter (13 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

8,2 lt/100km

34 MPG (UK) - 29 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

13 lt/100km

22 MPG (UK) - 19 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

70,94 £

82,61 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Mazda MX-5 II 1.8 Turbo (172 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 4x4
  • Power 172 hp
  • Max output (P) 6000 rpm
  • Torque 209 Nm
  • Max output (T) 5500
  • Wheel drive All wheel drive (4x4)
  • Number of doors 2
  • Number of seats 2
  • Tire size front 205/40 R17
  • Tire size rear 205/40 R17
Year
Mazda MX-5 II 1.8 Turbo (172 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Cabriolet
  • Length 3965 mm
  • Width 1680 mm
  • Height 1235 mm
  • Wheelbase 2265 mm
  • Turning Circle 10.4 m
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) 1120 kg
  • Total load weight -
  • Loading capacity -
  • Roof load -

Mazda MX-5 II 1.8 Turbo Review

2005 Mazda MX-5 II 1.8 is first presented in 2004 and proceeded in 2004 and 2005. MX-5 1.8 Turbo is a 2 doors Cabriolet in Rear wheel drive. Weight of the vehicle is 1120 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. MX-5 II 1.8 Turbo is powered by a 1.8 l engine. This 1839 cc engine size produces 172 Hp horsepower with 209 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with All wheel drive (4x4) wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is km/h (0 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 48 liters. Fuel economy in city is 0,0 lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel economy is 8,2 lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. MX-5 II 1.8 Turbo real World MPG/consumption is 12,7 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 55 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«