Kia

Kia > Retona 2.0 D (83 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003
  • Engine Engine 1998 cm3
  • Power Power 83 hp
  • Torque Torque 195 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Diesel
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 60 Liter (16 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

10,0 lt/100km

28 MPG (UK) - 24 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

14 lt/100km

21 MPG (UK) - 17 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

88,68 £

103,26 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Kia Retona 2.0 D (83 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 2x4
  • Power 83 hp
  • Max output (P) 4000 rpm
  • Torque 195 Nm
  • Max output (T) 2000
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 3
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 215/75R15
  • Tire size rear 215/75R15
Year
Kia Retona 2.0 D (83 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Off-road vehicle
  • Length 4000 mm
  • Width 1745 mm
  • Height 1835 mm
  • Wheelbase 2360 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume 394 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 1394 kg
  • Total load weight 1903 kg
  • Loading capacity 509 kg
  • Roof load -

Kia Retona 2.0 D Review

2003 Kia Retona 2.0 is first presented in 1999 and proceeded in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. Retona 2.0 D is a 3 doors Off-road vehicle in All wheel drive (4x4). Weight of the vehicle is 1394 kg with 394 liters trunk loading capacity. Retona 2.0 D is powered by a 2.0 l engine. This 1998 cc engine size produces 83 Hp horsepower with 195 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 20.5 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 124 km/h (77 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 60 liters. Fuel economy in city is 0,0 lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel economy is 10,0 lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Retona 2.0 D real World MPG/consumption is 13,7 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 37 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«