Volvo

Volvo > S60 II 2.0 D2 (120 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2015- 2016- 2017- 2018
  • Engine Engine 1969 cm3
  • Power Power 120 hp
  • Torque Torque 280 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Diesel
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 68 Liter (18 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

3,7 lt/100km

76 MPG (UK) - 64 MPG (US)
Year CO2 Emissions 96,0 g/100km
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

6 lt/100km

50 MPG (UK) - 42 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

99,77 £

116,17 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D2 (120 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 4x4
  • Power 120 hp
  • Max output (P) 3750 rpm
  • Torque 280 Nm
  • Max output (T) 1500
  • Wheel drive Rear wheel drive
  • Number of doors 4
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front -
  • Tire size rear -
Year
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D2 (120 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Sedan
  • Length 4635 mm
  • Width 1865 mm
  • Height 1484 mm
  • Wheelbase 2776 mm
  • Turning Circle 11.3 m
  • Trunk Volume 380 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 1568 kg
  • Total load weight 2090 kg
  • Loading capacity 522 kg
  • Roof load 75 kg

Volvo S60 II 2.0 D2 Review

2018 Volvo S60 II 2.0 is first presented in 2015 and proceeded in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. S60 2.0 D2 is a 4 doors Sedan in Front wheel drive. Weight of the vehicle is 1568 kg with 380 liters trunk loading capacity. S60 II 2.0 D2 is powered by a 2.0 l engine. This 1969 cc engine size produces 120 Hp horsepower with 280 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Rear wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 11.2 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 195 km/h (121 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is Euro 6. Fuel tank capacity is 68 liters. Fuel economy in city is 0,0 lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel economy is 3,7 lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. S60 II 2.0 D2 real World MPG/consumption is 5,6 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 52 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«