BMW

BMW > X5 M50d (381 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2013
  • Engine Engine 2993 cm3
  • Power Power 381 hp
  • Torque Torque 740 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Diesel
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 85 Liter (22 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Urban

8,8 lt/100km

32 MPG (UK) - 27 MPG (US)
Year Highway

6,8 lt/100km

41 MPG (UK) - 35 MPG (US)
Year Combined

7,5 lt/100km

38 MPG (UK) - 31 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

13 lt/100km

22 MPG (UK) - 19 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

125,63 £

146,29 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
BMW X5 M50d (381 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 6
  • Number of valves 4x6
  • Power 381 hp
  • Max output (P) 4000 rpm
  • Torque 740 Nm
  • Max output (T) 2000
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 255/50 R19 107W; 285/45 R19 111W
  • Tire size rear 255/50 R19 107W; 285/45 R19 111W
Year
BMW X5 M50d (381 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type SUV
  • Length 4857 mm
  • Width 2010 mm
  • Height 1766 mm
  • Wheelbase 2933 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) 2225 kg
  • Total load weight 2830 kg
  • Loading capacity 605 kg
  • Roof load -

BMW X5 M50d Review

2013 BMW X5 3.0’s production started in 2013 and continued in and 2013. X5 M50d is a 5 doors SUV in All wheel drive (4x4). Automobile weight is 2225 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. X5 M50d has a 3.0 l engine. With 2993 cc engine size it produces 381 Hp horsepower and 740 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in 5.4 seconds. Top speed is limited by 250 km/h (155 mph). The engine has a standard. Fuel tank capacity is 85 liters. Consumption in city is 8,8 lt/100km, consumption in highway is 6,8 lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is 7,5 lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated X5 M50d real World MPG/consumption is 12,6 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 68 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«