MAKES

Chevrolet

Chevrolet > Traverse II 2.0 (258 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2018- 2019
  • Engine Engine 1998 cm3
  • Power Power 258 hp
  • Torque Torque 400 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 73 Liter (19 gal)
Year Real MPG & Fuel Consumption
Average Fuel Consumption Cruise Average Speed Submiter
10.0 lt/100km High Way Slow (0 - 40 km/s) Guest
17.10.2023
10.0 lt/100km High Way Slow (0 - 40 km/s) Guest
17.10.2023
Year
Chevrolet Traverse II 2.0 (258 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 4x4
  • Power 258 hp
  • Max output (P) 5500 rpm
  • Torque 400 Nm
  • Max output (T) 3000
  • Wheel drive Rear wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 7-8
  • Tire size front 225/65 R18; 255/55 R20
  • Tire size rear 225/65 R18; 255/55 R20
Year
Chevrolet Traverse II 2.0 (258 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type SUV, Crossover
  • Length 5189 mm
  • Width 1996 mm
  • Height 1795 mm
  • Wheelbase 3071 mm
  • Turning Circle 11.9 m
  • Trunk Volume 651 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 1978 kg
  • Total load weight -
  • Loading capacity -
  • Roof load -

Chevrolet Traverse II 2.0 Review

2019 Chevrolet Traverse II 2.0’s production started in 2018 and continued in 2018 and 2019. Traverse 2.0 is a 5 doors SUV, Crossover in Front wheel drive. Automobile weight is 1978 kg with 651 liters trunk loading capacity. Traverse II 2.0 has a 2.0 l engine. With 1998 cc engine size it produces 258 Hp horsepower and 400 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with Rear wheel drive wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in seconds. Top speed is limited by km/h (0 mph). The engine has a standard. Fuel tank capacity is 73 liters. Consumption in city is N/A lt/100km, consumption in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is N/A lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated Traverse II 2.0 real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«