Great Wall

Great Wall > Cool Bear 1,5 (105 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012
  • Engine Engine 1497 cm3
  • Power Power 105 hp
  • Torque Torque 138 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 45 Liter (12 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

6,7 lt/100km

42 MPG (UK) - 35 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

9 lt/100km

31 MPG (UK) - 26 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

66,51 £

77,45 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Great Wall Cool Bear 1,5 (105 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves -x4
  • Power 105 hp
  • Max output (P) 6000 rpm
  • Torque 138 Nm
  • Max output (T) 4200
  • Wheel drive Rear wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front -
  • Tire size rear -
Year
Great Wall Cool Bear 1,5 (105 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Minivan
  • Length 3951 mm
  • Width 1695 mm
  • Height 1634 mm
  • Wheelbase 2499 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume 600 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 1260 kg
  • Total load weight -
  • Loading capacity -
  • Roof load -

Great Wall Cool Bear 1,5 Review

2012 Great Wall Cool Bear 1.5 is first presented in 2009 and proceeded in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. Cool Bear 1,5 is a 5 doors Minivan in Front wheel drive. Weight of the vehicle is 1260 kg with 600 liters trunk loading capacity. Cool Bear 1,5 is powered by a 1.5 l engine. This 1497 cc engine size produces 105 Hp horsepower with 138 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Rear wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 160 km/h (99 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is Euro 4. Fuel tank capacity is 45 liters. Fuel economy in city is 0,0 lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel economy is 6,7 lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Cool Bear 1,5 real World MPG/consumption is 9,1 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 35 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«