Suzuki

Suzuki > Cultus II Hatchback 1.3 i (5 dr) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 1988- 1989- 1990- 1991- 1992- 1993- 1994- 1995- 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003
  • Engine Engine 1298 cm3
  • Power Power 68 hp
  • Torque Torque 99 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 40 Liter (11 gal)
Year
Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.3 i (5 dr)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 2x4
  • Power 68 hp
  • Max output (P) 6000 rpm
  • Torque 99 Nm
  • Max output (T) 3500
  • Wheel drive Rear wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 155/70 R13
  • Tire size rear 155/70 R13
Year
Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.3 i (5 dr)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Hatchback
  • Length 3845 mm
  • Width 1590 mm
  • Height 1380 mm
  • Wheelbase 2365 mm
  • Turning Circle 9.6 m
  • Trunk Volume 280 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 805 kg
  • Total load weight 1290 kg
  • Loading capacity 485 kg
  • Roof load -

Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.3 i Review

2003 Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.3 is first presented in 1988 and proceeded in 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. Cultus 1.3 i is a 5 doors Hatchback in Front wheel drive. Weight of the vehicle is 805 kg with 280 liters trunk loading capacity. Cultus II Hatchback 1.3 i is powered by a 1.3 l engine. This 1298 cc engine size produces 5 dr horsepower with 99 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Rear wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 13 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 165 km/h (103 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 40 liters. Fuel economy in city is N/A lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel economy is N/A lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Cultus II Hatchback 1.3 i real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«