MAKES

Mitsubishi

Mitsubishi > Pajero Sport I 3.0 i V6 24V (177 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008
  • Engine Engine 2972 cm3
  • Power Power 177 hp
  • Torque Torque 255 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 74 Liter (20 gal)
Year
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 i V6 24V (177 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 6
  • Number of valves 4x6
  • Power 177 hp
  • Max output (P) 5000 rpm
  • Torque 255 Nm
  • Max output (T) 4500
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 245/70 R16 Q
  • Tire size rear 245/70 R16 Q
Year
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 i V6 24V (177 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Off-road vehicle
  • Length 4610 mm
  • Width 1775 mm
  • Height 1735 mm
  • Wheelbase 2725 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume 500 liter
  • Weight (Empty) 1940 kg
  • Total load weight 2510 kg
  • Loading capacity 570 kg
  • Roof load -

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 i V6 24V Review

2008 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 is first presented in 1998 and proceeded in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Pajero Sport 3.0 i V6 24V is a 5 doors Off-road vehicle in All wheel drive (4x4). Weight of the vehicle is 1940 kg with 500 liters trunk loading capacity. Pajero Sport I 3.0 i V6 24V is powered by a 3.0 l engine. This 2972 cc engine size produces 177 Hp horsepower with 255 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 14.4 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 175 km/h (109 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 74 liters. Fuel economy in city is N/A lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel economy is N/A lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Pajero Sport I 3.0 i V6 24V real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«