Mahindra

Mahindra > Commander 750 ST 2WD (62 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 1990- 1991- 1992- 1993- 1994- 1995- 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2013
  • Engine Engine 2112 cm3
  • Power Power 62 hp
  • Torque Torque 121 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Automatical
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Diesel
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 45 Liter (12 gal)
Year
Mahindra Commander 750 ST 2WD (62 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves 2x4
  • Power 62 hp
  • Max output (P) 4500 rpm
  • Torque 121 Nm
  • Max output (T) 2000
  • Wheel drive All wheel drive (4x4)
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 8
  • Tire size front -
  • Tire size rear -
Year
Mahindra Commander 750 ST 2WD (62 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Off-road vehicle
  • Length 4305 mm
  • Width 1680 mm
  • Height 1740 mm
  • Wheelbase 2680 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) 1300 kg
  • Total load weight 2080 kg
  • Loading capacity 780 kg
  • Roof load -

Mahindra Commander 750 ST 2WD Review

2013 Mahindra Commander 2.1’s production started in 1990 and continued in 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Commander 750 ST 2WD is a 5 doors Off-road vehicle in Rear wheel drive. Automobile weight is 1300 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. Commander 750 ST 2WD has a 2.1 l engine. With 2112 cc engine size it produces 62 Hp horsepower and 121 Nm torque. The power is transmitted by a speed gearbox with All wheel drive (4x4) wheel drive. Vehicle can accelerate from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) in seconds. Top speed is limited by 95 km/h (59 mph). The engine has a standard. Fuel tank capacity is 45 liters. Consumption in city is N/A lt/100km, consumption in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel consumption is N/A lt/100km according to official factory data. Estimated Commander 750 ST 2WD real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«