Great Wall

Great Wall > Steed 5 2.0 TCI (150 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2011- 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015- 2016
  • Engine Engine 1996 cm3
  • Power Power 150 hp
  • Torque Torque 0 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Diesel
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 70 Liter (18 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

8,4 lt/100km

34 MPG (UK) - 28 MPG (US)
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

12 lt/100km

24 MPG (UK) - 20 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

103,46 £

120,47 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Great Wall Steed 5 2.0 TCI (150 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves -x4
  • Power 150 hp
  • Max output (P) -
  • Torque -
  • Max output (T) - rpm
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 4
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front -
  • Tire size rear -
Year
Great Wall Steed 5 2.0 TCI (150 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type Pick-up
  • Length 5040 mm
  • Width 1800 mm
  • Height 1730 mm
  • Wheelbase 3050 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume -
  • Weight (Empty) -
  • Total load weight -
  • Loading capacity -
  • Roof load -

Great Wall Steed 5 2.0 TCI Review

2016 Great Wall Steed 5 2.0 is first presented in 2011 and proceeded in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. Steed 2.0 TCI is a 4 doors Pick-up in All wheel drive (4x4). Weight of the vehicle is 0 kg with 0 liters trunk loading capacity. Steed 5 2.0 TCI is powered by a 2.0 l engine. This 1996 cc engine size produces 150 Hp horsepower with 0 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 12.4 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 160 km/h (99 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 70 liters. Fuel economy in city is 0,0 lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel economy is 8,4 lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Steed 5 2.0 TCI real World MPG/consumption is 11,8 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 41 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«