Great Wall

Great Wall > Hover H5 2.4i (126 Hp) WLTP, MPG, Fuel consumption

  • Year Year 2009- 2010
  • Engine Engine 2378 cm3
  • Power Power 126 hp
  • Torque Torque 200 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox
  • Fuel Type Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 70 Liter (18 gal)
Year Fuel Consumption
Year Combined

11,7 lt/100km

24 MPG (UK) - 20 MPG (US)
Year CO2 Emissions 275,0 g/100km
Year User Fuel Consumption
Year Estimated Real Consumption

17 lt/100km

17 MPG (UK) - 14 MPG (US)
Year Cost to fill up the tank

103,46 £

120,47 €
Year Fuel Price
Year
Great Wall Hover H5 2.4i (126 Hp)
Technical Specs
  • Number of clynders 4
  • Number of valves -x4
  • Power 126 hp
  • Max output (P) -
  • Torque 200 Nm
  • Max output (T) - rpm
  • Wheel drive Front wheel drive
  • Number of doors 5
  • Number of seats 5
  • Tire size front 235/65 R17
  • Tire size rear 235/65 R17
Year
Great Wall Hover H5 2.4i (126 Hp)
Dimensions and Weight
  • Body type SUV
  • Length 4649 mm
  • Width 1810 mm
  • Height 1745 mm
  • Wheelbase 2700 mm
  • Turning Circle -
  • Trunk Volume 810 liter
  • Weight (Empty) -
  • Total load weight -
  • Loading capacity -
  • Roof load -

Great Wall Hover H5 2.4i Review

2010 Great Wall Hover H5 2.4 is first presented in 2009 and proceeded in 2009 and 2010. Hover H5 2.4i is a 5 doors SUV in All wheel drive (4x4). Weight of the vehicle is 0 kg with 810 liters trunk loading capacity. Hover H5 2.4i is powered by a 2.4 l engine. This 2378 cc engine size produces 126 Hp horsepower with 200 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with Front wheel drive wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 12.8 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 171 km/h (106 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 70 liters. Fuel economy in city is 0,0 lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is 0,0 lt/100km and combined fuel economy is 11,7 lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Hover H5 2.4i real World MPG/consumption is 16,8 lt/100km. It is expected to consume 43 percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Comments

Be the first to comment...

Comment

«