Suzuki

Fiche technique Suzuki > Cultus II Hatchback 1.0 i (3 dr)

  • Year Année 1991- 1992- 1993- 1994- 1995- 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003
  • Engine Moteur 993 cm3
  • Power Puissance 53 hp
  • Torque Couple 76 Nm
  • Gearbox Gearbox Manual
  • Fuel Type Type de carburant Petrol (Gasoline)
  • Fuel Tank Fuel Tank 40 Liter
Year
Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.0 i (3 dr)
Les caractéristiques techniques
  • Nombre de cylindres 3
  • Nombre de soupapes 2x3
  • Puissance 53 hp
  • Sortie max. (P) 5700 rpm
  • Couple 76 Nm
  • 3300
  • Roue motrice Rear wheel drive
  • Nombre de portières 3
  • Nombre de sièges 5
  • Dimension du Pneu avant 155/70 R13
  • Dimension du Pneu arrière 155/70 R13
Year
Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.0 i (3 dr)
Dimensions et Poids
  • Type de carrosserie Hatchback
  • Longueur 3745 mm
  • Largeur 1590 mm
  • Hauteur 1350 mm
  • Empattement 2265 mm
  • Cercle Tournant 9.6 m
  • Volume du Coffre 280 liter
  • Poids (a vide) 730 kg
  • Poids total de charge 1250 kg
  • Capacité de chargement 520 kg
  • Charge de toit -

Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.0 i Analyse

2003 Suzuki Cultus II Hatchback 1.0 is first presented in 1991 and proceeded in 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. Cultus 1.0 i is a 3 doors Hatchback in Front wheel drive. Weight of the vehicle is 730 kg with 280 liters trunk loading capacity. Cultus II Hatchback 1.0 i is powered by a 1.0 l engine. This 993 cc engine size produces 3 dr horsepower with 76 Nm torque. Transmission is provided by a speed gearbox with AWD wheel drive. The acceleration time from zero to 100 km/h (60 mph) is 16 seconds. Top speed of the vehicle is 145 km/h (90 mph) The vehicle’s emission standard is . Fuel tank capacity is 40 liters. Fuel economy in city is N/A lt/100km, Fuel economy in highway is N/A lt/100km and combined fuel economy is N/A lt/100km according to officially published data by manufacturers. Cultus II Hatchback 1.0 i real World MPG/consumption is N/A lt/100km. It is expected to consume N/A percent more fuel than factory data in real conditions and during test drives.

Commentaires

Soyez le premier à commenter...

Commentaire

«